Not a member? Join now
touch-upbanner image

Green Living: Oil Bunk

Hi kids. Last week's lesson was all about the evil doers in Congress who are stunting our collective growth toward a happier planet. I'd like to follow that up with some information on Big Oil companies and other such meanies who are also raining on our parade.

You know how all the oil companies are running commercials these days about the good work they are doing on alternative fuels and blah blah blah? Pure bunk. Well, at least 93% bunk. For instance, BP has allegedly promised to spend $8 billion on "alternative energy" by 2015. However, during the 2006-2008 period, they only coughed up $1.5 billion for wind and solar attempts. That's half of what was allotted. The other half went toward working on petroleum-based synthetic gas. Talk about beating a dead horse! Not only that, according to Mother Jones, “in 2006 alone, BP's capital expenditures on oil and gas exploration, production, refining and marketing came to $16.2 billion; its revenues were $274 billion, and its profits $22 billion.” Whoa, Nelly! So much for that whole “Beyond Petroleum” thing they've been touting.

These guys are using the PR machine to their advantage in a big, bad way. They do a minimal amount of alternative research in order to get the maximum amount of good will from consumers, then it's back to more of the same. According to a report from the Center for American Progress, despite average profits of $230,000 a minute in 2007, Big Oil companies are only spending a tiny sliver of their total profits (about .5%) on developing renewable fuels. It seems BP and Shell are the good guys, topping the list at 1.2%, while ExxonMobil hit bottom with a big goose egg.

Another thing they're doing is moving the goal post in terms of what is considered clean energy. Back to Mother Jones, “In a 2006 report, the oil-industry-friendly Institute for Energy Research said that U.S. oil and gas companies had invested $98 billion in 'emerging energy technologies'... But the vast majority of this funding went to develop 'frontier hydrocarbons' — new, often filthy methods of producing more oil and gas.” Liars. Can we call shenanigans on them?

Since I mentioned Shell, let's take a look-see, shall we? These guys are serious Earth haters. They've only thrown about $1 billion at alternative options including solar, wind and hydrogen fuel cell technologies. Instead, they've been focused on pillaging Canada's tar sands to shore up their production numbers. They are having to stir up that controversy because they once made a deal with the devil. See, Shell spent some 10 years and $22 billion building Sakhalin-2, a massive gas and oil project on the eastern outskirts of Russia. Problem is, Vladimir Putin came in, took the project away and handed it over to the state energy company, Gazprom, even demanding that Shell pay a fairly hefty dividend in order to retain some bit of a financial stake in the project. Oh, Puty Put.

Then there are companies including Americans for Balanced Energy Choices, ConocoPhillips, BP, Chevron and GE pushing this whole “clean coal” BS on us. Talk about a load of hooey! The particulate levels may be lower than burning coal, but the gasification plants produce more CO2 than natural gas plants. It's dangerous, expensive, irresponsible and just plain wasteful. And at profits of $230,000 a minute, it's also outright insulting.

13 Comments

Advert

"I love my muuuuum mum mum mum mum... muuuum (motorbyke's engine noise)
(...)
Love for mum : the best energy !

Pure and not polluting"

I love you, Kel. They

I love you, Kel. They certainly are using the "green" PR in an VERY bad way. They are very scared that they will end up losing mega-billions. They don't care about the land at all - and there is nothing clean about coal. Period. If they have the technology to go clean now, they should and invest in reusable energy - but they aren't in the business to NOT make oil based business work.

I was watching the news this evening and there was a report out about the forecasting of our Electric in PA. I have Met-Ed and the forecast for the increase by 2010 is something like 54%. I know this has nothing to do with oil, but it does.

54% is a lot.

These corporations are sucking people dry - unnecessarily. They know their time is running out - and people are wanting to really go green. If you have money and a goal to convert, you will - but they are sucking people dry before they convert and people will get caught up in it.

I'm sick and tired of people telling me that these "treehuggers are freaks - and we have a finite amount of oil locked up on our own land if we just would drill that damn wild area!"

They really feel it's this treehugger thing and "green" thing that our gas prices and oil prices are through the roof. What really scares me is that some people are only onto the "green" kick because they want lower prices, at any cost.

I love getting something for a good price. I really do - but is being conscious only for the rich?

rovermom :)

Life is a 3D puzzle and everyone has a piece!

NEW! OurChart Photo Assignment and My Blog

Auto power

The only good solution I can think of for now: Get on your bikes and ride! You can use your righteous anger at Big Oil to fuel your commute. Bring a change of clothes for work. Get a basket for groceries. Too far or too much to carry? Check out public transit. While we wait for more and more alternate energy sources, explore your alternate lifestyle options to reduce, reduce, reduce! The bonus is that your body will thank you for using it more, improving all aspects of life (see Leah's plug for exercise's effect on libido). And you'll save money.
Cost of bike helmet + baskets + rear rack = just about one tank of gas for a midsize car. And you don't have to buy it again the following week.

PS I haven't even noticed those BP "Green" adds because it's been so long since I've been at the pumps (okay, and I don't really watch TV, but you get my drift...)
~paz y amor siempre

editor

And I so thought

that BP was saving little chirpy frogs in the amazon by drilling in Canada, boy those adds are deceiving....

other sources of energy are

other sources of energy are just as flawed though. that's what i discovered when researching switching my car over to run on solar, electric, or vegetable oil. those methods are still working within the same problematic formula. you're still using up lots of resources. this whole corn thing is nonsense. it'll do nothing but send the price of beef through the roof.

author

I think there are certainly

I think there are certainly flaws to most technologies, but oil and coal are at the top of the list.

Thanks Kelly

My BS detector was set off by those "green" ads from the oil companies. You've confirmed my suspicions. At this point, most of the claims of political/corporate/military interests get the little voice (uh-oh, she's hearing voices), that says "they're lying." It's helpful, though to have some of the facts. Thanks.
Lezbeth

author

Facts are beautiful things.

Facts are beautiful things.

Conflict of Interest

I have never understood how it is not a direct conflict of interest that oil and energy companies making record profits are getting big government grants to fund the so called "research" on alternative forms of energy? What joke! All these companies want to do is try to control or slow down the process of alternative energy so they can keep making that $230,000 a minute! And then the Energy Act in 2005 secretly provided billions in tax incentives and loans for nuclear power, calling it alternative energy. Yeah, I remain highly insulted...

author

Don't get me started on nuclear...

The fact that people consider nuclear energy "clean" is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever heard. Between the waste and the exposure and the big bull's eye target on the reactors, it just doesn't make ANY sense.

Frontier Hydrocarbons

Kelly, that term "frontier hydrocarbons" is a new one to me. I better go do some homework on this topic. Thanks for the information.

author

Me too. Let me know what you

Me too. Let me know what you find.

More on frontier hydrocarbons

Kelly, I did a bit of research in the Oxford Companion to the Earth and discovered that "frontier hydrocarbons" refers to this: "Consequently, the remainder of the world's giant fields probably lie in completely unexplored frontier regions such as the Arctic, eastern Russia, central Africa, and underlying the very deep waters of the ocean shelves."

That helped clarify the terminology for me.